STEAL THESE SLIDES: I'm Making PPT Decks on HR/Recruiting With No Formatting For You to Use (as your own)...
KD's Personal Mission Statement on HR/Recruiting/Talent in Troubled Times...

The Coming Epic Fail of Team Meetings Post-COVID (half in room, half on Zoom)...

There's a million things to think about in a Post-Covid world.  Here's one you don't think about but you might as well get ahead of, especially if your team is going to exist in some type of hybrid existence: White_House_Situation_Room_Friday_May_18_2007

THE NEW NORMAL WILL FEATURE PEOPLE TRYING TO HOLD TEAM MEETINGS WITH HALF THE TEAM LIVE IN THE OFFICE AND HALF ON ZOOM/TEAMS.

AND IT'S GOING TO SUCK.

Think about it. Before we accepted cameras on as the norm during COVID, you generally didn't try and hold a team meeting with half or more of the people live and half on Zoom.

Why not? Because it's impossible for the people who aren't live to have the same experience and rights as those live in the room. If you're not in the room, you are a second class citizen, and it's the way it has to be. Please listen, and we'll throw it to you for your stage banter when you're ready.

The Zoom/Teams rush during COVID changed those expectations. Since most, if not all were remote, we turned on the cameras and everyone was treated equal.

When we go back to the offices, many of us will try and keep the remote team on video, and it's going to be awful.

When half or more of your team is live and in the office for a meeting, you can't make the Zoom people equal. They can't see the room, read body language and know when they can informally interject and organically participate. But man, will they try. The people who are live can't do the same with the Zoomers,

The answer is simple and the new rules should be clear:

If half or over half of your team is live, you require the remote folks to call in (no video) and run their participation in the live meeting like it's 2019. They'll thank you for it.

If a number of people live is less than half (especially if it approaches only 25-33% live and in the room) you hold the entire meeting on Zoom or Teams. The 3 of 10 people in the office join from their personal office via Teams. You'll have a better meeting.

Some of you will try to do the live/Zoom mix with half or more of the people in the conference room on one camera. It will be an epic failure.  

Will you understand how awful it is?  That's a whole other question.

(email subscribers click through for Gary V video on this topic below)

Comments

Dan S

How is audio-only superior to video and audio? I don't understand.

Jonathan F

From pioneering innovation in the space of HR tech to hosting some of the most prestigious names in thought leadership, peopleHum has grown and how! Here’s a specially curated power pack of the 200 global best thought leaders redefining the future of work.https://www.peoplehum.com/blog/200-most-influential-thought-leaders-to-follow 

rishi

Here’s a list of the Top 20 HR experts leading some of the most important conversations about our workplace today, including links to their LinkedIn and Twitter accounts, so you can officially join in https://www.peoplehum.com/blog/top-20-hr-author-leader

wuxiaworld

Blog is really interesting. with many good and outstanding articles. Thanks for sharing such impressive articles. Continue to update!

directions

Thanks for letting me better understand this. good and useful topic.

Hiresmart

Thanks for this great post. Virtual team meetings has become integral part of the company now during COVID time.

TM Systems

Thanks for sharing this informative blog.

slope game

Many of us will attempt to keep the remote team on video when we return to the offices, and it will be terrible.

mapquest driving directions

In contrast, remote participants may feel left out, have difficulty hearing or being heard, and could miss out on non-verbal cues that are vital for effective communication.

The comments to this entry are closed.