My Photo

« Are Your Communication Issues An Excuse for Doing What You Want? (The Million Dollar Question) | Main | What HR Can Learn From Boiler Room: "Telling's Not Selling" »

June 19, 2013

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8345275cf69e201901d9279e1970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The SPHR and Money - Chicken or the Egg?:

Comments

Kevin

You're right that it's a bit of "causality" issue. Yea more people with certification do better, but those who are already doing better probably go for certification.

I like the HR assistant data (not that part that you get a promotion in 5 years, yikes that's a long time) but rather the comparison with control group...
63% of HR assistants with certification received a promotion within five years, compared to only 34% of those without certification.

I think it depends on your specialty too. Want to get into recruiting? Sure PHR, we'll let you run background checks. Want ER investigations? Hmmm.

Linda

Definitely an aptly titled post. As an SPHR for 12 years (yikes!), I personally don't think the test itself meant a damned thing. The thing that I *do* like about seeing someone with the certification is that it means they will continually learn because the HRCI requires recertification every 3 years. It forces new learning, new experiences, etc that might otherwise not have occurred. But I am of the camp that the most successful are the ones who get certified, not the certification causing the success.

Jim Durbin

It could also be that HR Executives are notoriously bad at hiring, and thus fall back on industry certifications because their screening process lacks rigor.

Or it could be simple bias - if you have a certification, you'd want to justify the cost, time and expense in hiring someone else with the same certification.

That second example happens all the time with college degrees. Someone with a worthless degree demands a new employee have a degree as well, even when it's not required. It's an easy filter, one that isn't challenged much yet.

Or it could be that SPHR certifications are superior to engineering certifications in their selection of candidates. But I don't have one, haven't ever hired anyone that has one, so what do I know?

Dianne

I know far too many people in my workplace with SPHR or PHR who can't even spell FLSA or FMLA. The certification is essentially meaningless. People who apply to sit for the exam with little practical knowledge or experience in HR get certified the same as the HR professional successfully practicing for 20 or more years.

It's not a true measure of KSAs, but some employers think it is and therefore value the person that has HRCI certification. I'm an SPHR because my employer put it forward as an initiative and paid for the course and exam, but I will put my graduate degree and job experience up against my SPHR any day and prevail. HR is a profession that matures over time with experience and exposure. It cannot be learned in a 12-week prep course and the HR professional's effectiveness cannot be proven with a mutiple-choice exam no matter how difficult the measure is perceived to be.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Subscribe!!!

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner