My Photo

« What HR Can Learn From Boiler Room: "Telling's Not Selling" | Main | GOOGLE: Now Thinks Those Brainteaser Questions Are A Complete Waste of Time... »

June 21, 2013

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8345275cf69e2017d41e8b2a1970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Hiring For Motivational Fit Vs. Hiring For Culture...:

Comments

Scott Allison

You nailed it! My favourite questions in an interview are "what did you like/not like about your last job". I repeat that constantly, and just let them talk... the real person (usually) emerges

Alan O

I find it interesting that, whenever the topic of personality/motivational assessment is broached among HR bloggers, the reaction typically leans negative.

Yet when you lay out the business case for understanding individual Motivation, as you have here, there is little disagreement.

So why is it that we all seem to understand the importance of Motivation in employees, yet we're skeptical of instruments that help us "do a deep dive"... ?

At our organization, we use a combination of assessment and tailored interview questions (The assessment helps us decide which areas of motivation to probe further, based on any gaps between the candidates' needs & drives, and what our position entails)

KD

Hi Alan -

I'm not skeptical at all. What makes you think that I am?

We use a instrument that's similar to yours, I'm sure - something that tells us more about how a candidate wants to work, so we do the best we can to match beyond knowledge, skills and abilities...

Thanks - KD

Alan O

Hey, KD...

My observation wasn't aimed at you or any other particular person. Just a general sense that, whenever this topic comes up on the various blog sites I watch, the boo-birds come out. Over on FOT, Ruettimann riffed on this theme 2/13/13. I've seen the same sentiment expressed elsewhere over the years, and it always puzzles me, since my organization finds assessments so useful--for selection, employee development, conflict resolution, etc.

Granted, Ruettimann singles out the Myers-Briggs, and I'm in whole-hearted agreement that the MB has major psychometric flaws that render its reliability and validity questionable at best. But there are higher-quality instruments out there.

I'd guess 75% of what most organizations hire for, and 99.9% of what most organizations fire for, falls under the category of personality/motivation. So that "objective assessment...on the good stuff the candidate finds satisfying" is crucial.

KD

Alan -

Agree on all points - I think most companies need to find a simple tool they're comfortable with to assess the fit - most manager are just really, really bad on the hiring foront.

We've got one that has a cognitive processing speed, rules orientation, assertiveness, etc - and I think it's great.

Sorry for ping that seemed sensitive - our platform actually shows me as low sensitivity...

KD

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Subscribe!!!

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner