One strong opinion I have is this - if you aren't recruiting as a HR Generalist, you're an administrator, subject to being outsourced at your employer's whim in the future. I believe HR people need to be heavily involved in the Talent acquisition process in their companies. I know recruiting can and is outsourced, but if you are good on the recruiting front as a HR Manager, you'll always have a job.
So, it stands to reason that Recruiters are great candidates to be HR Managers. Jim Stroud recently agreed with that, and wondered aloud "why not HR" to his recruiting brethren.
Of course, not all Recruiters would make solid HR Managers. But many would. Here's my list of the top
three reasons why recruiters would potentially make great HR Managers, then my top three barriers that have to be validated before you would ever put a recruiter in the HR Manager role.
Why I love Recruiters as potential HR people:
1. Energy - Most recruiters have better energy than your average HR Manager. Energy is good, and our profession can stand some spicing up...
2. A..B..C.. - (Always Be Closing) - Recruiters are salespeople, used to working a funnel and closing business. There's usually a scoreboard involved, be it the number of vacancies, time to fill or cost to fill. That means most recruiters worth a promotion to HR Manager know how to compete. Another good attribute to have.
3. Employer Brand Awareness - As part of the ABC equation, recruiters are always aware of your brand proposition. That experience bodes well as they make the transition to retaining as well as recruiting employees. Who better to tell your employees why this is a cool place?
Before you hire that recruiter as a HR Manager, check under the hood for the following:
1. Patience - HR Managers have to have patience daily. Workplace politics and human nature conspire to make HR Managers take 4 steps where 1 would have been OK in order to keep everyone happy. If your recruiter doesn't have that, don't put them in the job.
2. Judgment - What's the reputation for integrity and good decision making with the recruiter in question? Viewed as a business partner by the departments they recruit for, or the jester that wears the lampshade after knocking a couple back at the Christmas party? This question isn't limited to recruiters, it would be there for any transfer from another area into HR. The recruiter has to have a good reputation, or it won't work...
3. Tolerance for Administrivia - Recruiters will see more administration in this role than they are used to. If they seem overly frustrated by the administrative burdens of your ATS or EEOC process, they probably won't be a great fit.
Recruiters are a great candidate source for HR managers openings. Follow these guidelines to determine if they have the chops, and you'll end up with a great selection without getting burned....


Kris:
I liked you blog, however, I would like to add a couple of other things you need to look for in an HR Manager.
1. A tolerance of ambiguity. So much of HR is "gray". If they can't deal with that they will be frustrated.
2. Good judgement
3. Ability and desire to continually learn. HR is ever changing. Legislation and court cases constantly change the playing conditions. YOu have to be able and willing to adapt to these. If you don't have a solid education in HR you have to be willing to learn it.
I think a recruiting background is good because of the sales approach. I personally believe all HR Managers should approach their jobs as being "salesy".
Posted by: Michael Haberman | December 05, 2007 at 03:11 PM
I believe that the role of HR is changing and this may support your assertion further. Technology is finally doing what it is supposed to do and is providing a useful tool for HRDs. Recruiters tend to be more technology savvy and as such tend to understand the potential for Web 2.0 technology etc.
Scott
Posted by: Scott McArthur | December 08, 2007 at 05:11 AM